lfct

Archive Home Contact Writer Index Back Issues

Laissez Faire City Times Archive

 

 

Con Men

Manipulating the Markets?

by Rex Rogers

Prologue

"The apparently leaked market bailout story in the Sunday's (Feb. 23) Washington Post put a floor under the market.
-- Bill King --

Black Monday

On the last Monday in October, the Dow dropped 550 points and, to everyone's relief, the exchanges stopped the trading thirty minutes early. If the new rules had not required the halt, it might have been much worse. Is this the beginning of the great crash?

If it is, it won't be from a lack of planning on the part of President Clinton, Robert Ruben and the Federal Reserve. According to credible sources, it has become government policy to "protect" the investment community from the laws of gravity.

The government has even admitted as much. Alan Greenspan gave a speech in Lueven, Belgium on the 14th of January, this year, in which he touted the Fed's obligation to bail out banks and private financial institutions not just by printing unlimited amounts of money but also through "direct intervention in market events."

S&P 500 Contracts

For a while now, there have been rumours among traders that the US government was stepping into the market from time to time to purchase S&P contracts. The obvious reason was to thwart short sellers and stem possible panics.

The rumours held that the government was buying S&P futures contracts through the good offices of Goldman Sachs, the firm once headed by Treasury Secretary Robert Ruben.

If true, many people must have known about it. Everyone who did would be in a position to profit dramatically by purchasing the S&P futures in the full knowledge that the federal government was poised to intervene in the market to guarantee the profitability of their trades. Under those conditions, anyone could trade S&Ps as profitably as Hillary Clinton did cattle futures.

But I was sceptical. After all, such activity would (or should) require congressional approval. Also, if short selling is a legally sanctioned activity, wouldn't it be highly illegal to secretly intervene with public funds on behalf of the longs and ignore the rights of the shorts? But seeing is believing, and now I'm convinced its true.

Tawdry Tuesday

The next morning after Monday's big 550 point break, I, and everyone else trading S&Ps witnessed a most remarkable event. It must have been the most blatant display of market manipulation in the history of Wall Street. Or at least the biggest and most public. In spite of this, to my knowledge, not a peep was made by the establishment press.

The tip-off was the "timing" of a dramatic rise in the premium (number of points in which the S&P contracts were trading in excess of the value of the underling stocks).

I have traded the S&P for years and I've never seen anything like it. The average "fair value" of the premium that day was 600 points.

Exactly six minutes before Bill Clinton was to address the market crisis on television, the premium rose almost instantly to 3,500. This was undoubtedly caused by the concerted purchase of what had to have been at least a billion dollars worth of S&P contracts.

The Computers Blinked

The strange thing is that it almost failed to work.

Normally, anytime the premium rises just a little bit above the fair value, computers which are programed by the arbitrage investment groups automatically enter orders to sell the overvalued contracts and simultaneously enter orders to buy the undervalued stocks generating an automatic riskless profit. But this time it didn't work. At least not like it should have.

The premium rise was so fast and so big that, evidently, the fail-safe systems kicked in whereby the computer didn't believe what it saw. Under these conditions, it stops trading and calls a human to see what is wrong.

When I saw the 3,500 premium, I thought the same thing. Some kind of computer error. I immediately looked to see if the stock prices were rising, and they weren't. Dead in the water!

I looked up at the TV, saw Bill, and it dawned on me.

It was Slick Willie doing what he does best. Blatant manipulation of the highest order.

I jumped in and made a very good profit. A lot of other traders did too. Of course Hilliary and Craig Livingstone were way ahead of me. But the computers were slower than all of us.

It took about a half hour for their operators to override the systems and order the mass purchases of stock that the feds had been counting on. Ultimately, though belatedly, it still worked.

A New Bull Market?

All things considered, the con was perfect.

The back of the would-be crash was broken and the bull was reborn. At least for now. The real mystery is why and how the media keeps mum.

A concerted investigation by the Wall Street Journal, New York Times or Washington Post would surely reveal enough evidence to blow this outrage sky high. This is nothing less than the illegal clandestine tampering with the free market.

But like the murder of Vincent Foster, the rigging of Wall Street is a dirty little secret the media establishment would rather not reveal.

The "Big Lie" & Waiting for the "Second Shoe"

The American people suffer less from ignorance and more from an illusion of knowledge. The percieved knowledge that the proveribal "freedom of the press" will protect their society from the "Big Lie."

I, for one, want to congratulate the Laissez Faire City Times on its first issue today on the internet.

Just as the VCR helped to strip the scales of socialist government duplicity from the eyes of the Russian people, it is the internet and efforts like this newspaper which will ultimately do the same for the Americans.

Hopefully with the same result. I can't wait to see the other shoe drop.

Let freedom ring!

Volume 1 Issue 1 November 1, 1997